AI strategy, including governance, curriculum integration, pedagogical redesign, teacher training and family alignment for Swiss primary and secondary schools — delivered at the scale of a single school or small network, in a distinctly Swiss register.
Majorities of teachers across Europe already use generative AI in lesson planning and preparation. Students are ahead of their schools — often using AI at home when they cannot access it at school. Swiss schools face the same reality, on a Swiss timetable.
Switzerland's cantonal coordination and human-centred posture is one of Europe's most measured. It is also one of the slowest. Estonia has rolled out national AI capability to all upper-secondary schools. France has made AI curriculum mandatory. Swiss school boards will decide, this year, whether the Swiss pace still serves Swiss students.
Students without access to AI at school fall behind those who use it at home. This is a safeguarding and equity concern before it is a competitiveness one — and it lands on the Board.
Vision, ownership model, Board oversight, approved-tools policy, human-oversight rules, and an assessment-integrity approach — built into your existing school governance, not layered on top.
Outcome: a strategy your Board can approve and your leadership team can implement.
A staged programme aligned with UNESCO's AI Competency Framework for Teachers and DigCompEdu — subject-specific, cohort-based, and sustained through Professional Learning Communities.
Outcome: teachers fluent enough to lead AI in their classroom, not to be led by it.
Age-appropriate AI literacy for students, calibrated to Swiss cantonal curriculum expectations — combined with a workable approach to assessment integrity in a generative-AI world.
Outcome: pedagogy that survives the technology.
A structured session for your Board or leadership team on what AI now puts on the school — with a diagnostic your Board can use to test its own readiness.
Outcome: a Board that knows what it does not yet know about AI in your school.
Communication frameworks for parent evenings, community briefings, and public position statements on AI use in your school.
Outcome: parent trust built on substance, not on defensive silence.
Your school Board is going to make AI decisions either way — about strategy, teacher capability, student use, and risk. Make them with the clarity, confidence, and control the role now requires.
